| Issue date: September 17, 2000
In this article:
Easing
the impact of divorce
Children
of divorce: 25 years later
A landmark new study
that tracked kids from broken homes for a quarter-century finds
the negative impact of divorce continues well into adulthood.
by Hara Estroff Marano
"Part
of me is always waiting for disaster to strike. ... I live in dread
that some terrible loss will change my life." That, according to
psychoanalyst Judith Wallerstein, is what divorce sounds like 25
years after the fact, among those it hits hardest -- the children.
Wallerstein, founder of the Center for the Family in Transition
in Corte Madera, Calif., is one of the nation's leading experts
on divorce. Her new book, The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A 25-Year
Landmark Study (Hyperion, $24.95), contends that divorce marks offspring
for life.
Her troubling, inevitably controversial study offers a close-up
view of the first generation to grow into adulthood with a 50% divorce
rate. Together with other recent studies that have followed large
numbers of the children of divorce, it provides some answers to
the question: How does divorce affect children?
Each year divorce complicates the lives of more than 1 million
Americans under age 18 by creating two households and the need for
two newly different relationships with their parents. But the impact
can go well beyond that.
- The degree of fallout and its duration depend on a number of
factors. Among them:
- The nature of the marriage before the divorce.
- The nastiness and anger caused by the divorce.
- The role of divorced fathers in their children's lives.
- And, above all, the quality of parental support and control
before, during and after the divorce.
Long after their parents have parted company, gone on to happier
unions or attempted some other version of the good life, the children
of divorce, even as adults, are still spinning from its effects,
Wallerstein insists.
Karen James was 36 when she detailed to Wallerstein the long shadow
cast by her parents' divorce. Like so many other children of divorce,
James had embarked on a search for lasting love, yet was so deeply
anxious that she was unable to trust others. A fear of abandonment
kept her clinging to a string of unsuitable or troubled partners.
Twice before (in her books Surviving the Breakup: How Children
and Parents Cope With Divorce and Second Chances: Men, Women, and
Children a Decade After Divorce), Wallerstein had tapped into the
lives of Karen James and 130 other children in San Francisco's affluent
Marin County suburbs who were between ages 3 and 18 when their parents
first separated. And twice before, Wallerstein has told us that
divorce abruptly ends kids' childhood, filling it with loneliness
and worry about their parents, and hurtling them prematurely and
recklessly into adolescence.
"But it's in adulthood that children of divorce suffer the most,"
Wallerstein contends. Feeling totally unprepared and thoroughly
pessimistic, they encounter repeated failure and heartbreak as they
dive into adult relationships. With no clues to the type of person
they are looking for, they enter and stick with relationships they
know are doomed from the start. Even in good relationships, they
expect disaster. And they go to pieces over "the mundane differences
and inevitable conflicts" found in every close relationship, Wallerstein
says.
By the time the children of divorce reach their 30s, she finds,
only half are doing well in their personal lives. Interestingly,
their work lives are unscathed.
Because only 30% of divorced fathers in her study chipped in for
their kids' college educations, Wallerstein predicts a backlash
by the children of divorce against their dads, now approaching their
senior years. Bitter children threaten to withhold the emotional
and financial aid often needed in old age as payback for fathers
who did not stay connected. That could have tremendous societal
repercussions. "Who," Wallerstein asks, "will take care of an older
generation estranged from its children?"
Still, the portrait Wallerstein paints may be too pessimistic
and her research methods flawed, others contend. Specifically, her
study lacks a control group, so there's no way to know for sure
whether all the problems that developed in the children of divorce
stem from the divorce, from other aspects of their lives or from
the normal perturbations of young adulthood.
In the short term, divorce is always troublesome for children,
says Mavis Hetherington, doyenne of divorce researchers. Now professor
emeritus of psychology at the University of Virginia, she has videotaped
and scrutinized the workings of 1,400 divorced families since the
early 1970s. Hetherington pinpoints a crisis period of about two
years in the immediate aftermath of separation when the adults,
preoccupied with their own lives, typically take their eye off parenting
just when their children are reeling from loss and feeling bewildered.
In fact, divorce actually can be better for the children if there
has been a great deal of conflict in the marriage, or if the household
is disorganized and chaotic, say sociologists Paul R. Amato and
Alan Booth of Pennsylvania State University, who followed 2,000
families for nearly two decades. They found that the kids of high-conflict
families whose parents divorce wind up just as happy and do just
as well as others their age who grow up with happily married parents.
It's a different story for the children of marriages that were
not particularly hostile before a break-up. Typically, the husband
and wife were drifting along unhappily, their sex life non-existent
-- but they seldom fought. Their kids didn't mind; in fact, they
didn't even notice. "Divorce in a low-conflict marriage is just
devastating to kids," Amato concludes. Adds William Doherty, professor
of family science at the University of Minnesota, "Children are
not oriented to the quality of your sex life or whether your spouse
is your soul mate."
Doherty says it's "no longer clear" to him that it's fair to the
children when parents leave a non-destructive marriage "to pursue
your bliss or because you don't want to give children a bad model
of marital intimacy."
It's not surprising that the wisest words on divorce may come
from a child of divorce herself. Stephanie Staal is a 28-year-old
writer who has explored the impact of marital break-up in a new
book, The Love They Lost (Delacourt Press, $23). She interviewed
120 adult children of divorce and wound up impressed by the complexity
of their reactions. Referring to the wide variation in parental
support, household conflict and explanations among her subjects,
she observes that "there is no typical divorce. It's the way people
do it that defines its effects."
Hara Estroff Marano is editor at large of Psychology Today
and editor in chief of the upcoming publication Infantelligence.
Go to top
Easing the
impact of divorce
Advice from America's best experts on divorce and the family:
- Recognize that divorce is not something that has to be settled
only once, when the break-up occurs. Children, even adult ones,
have a recurring need for information and support at life's major
developmental passages.
- Go out of your way to maintain vigilance and support as a parent.
Divorce makes children feel the fragility of emotional bonds.
- After divorce, children are even more in need of what they couldn't
get before: a sense of their two parents collaborating on their
behalf. Continuing conflict is a stress that can derail development.
- Keep your children connected to the extended family of the non-custodial
parent; they need aunts and uncles and grandparents. Think of
it as social capital: The more they have, the easier life is for
everyone.
- As children head into adolescence and beyond, explain generally
-- not in sordid detail -- why your marriage broke up. Telling the
kids about mistakes you made actually helps them feel hopeful.
- Step up the supervision in adolescence. Speak up -- always respectfully,
with explanation -- if you think your children's regular friends
or romantic partners are unsuitable.
Illustration by: HEIDI YOUNGER for USA WEEKEND
|